Article Review I

Purpose

Write a 250–300 word review of one peer-reviewed empirical research article related to your developing research topic.

Your review should explain:

What problem was investigated? → How was it investigated? → What was discovered? → Why does it matter for my research?

The goal is to show that you can understand, accurately report, and evaluate research rather than summarize every part of an article.

---

1. Learning Outcomes

By the end of this learning experience, students will be able to:

• identify and accurately report the main problem, purpose, methodology, findings, and conclusions of a research article;
• explain how the article contributes to their own developing research topic; and
• use appropriate academic language, reporting tense, and cautious claims when discussing research.

---

2. Learning Context and Content

Essential Content

Students will draw upon:

• the Student Guide: Writing a 250–300 Word Article Review;
• a peer-reviewed empirical research article related to their research topic;
• appropriate reporting tense, modal verbs, and hedging;
• APA in-text citation and reference conventions.

Prior Knowledge

Students should already be able to:

• identify the basic sections of an empirical research article;
• identify a developing research topic or problem;
• paraphrase information from a source.

Connection to Learning

This assignment helps students begin identifying and evaluating research that may later be used in their annotated bibliography and literature review.

---

3. Apply & Create

Central Task

Write a 250–300 word article review organized into four short paragraphs.

Students will:

1. Problem and Purpose — about 50–60 words

   Explain the problem, importance, purpose, and research question(s).

2. Methodology — about 40–50 words

   Identify the participants/context, research design, and main data-collection method(s).

3. Major Findings — about 70–80 words

   Explain two or three important findings and distinguish findings from interpretation.

4. Conclusions and Relevance — about 70–90 words

   Explain the authors’ conclusion and an important limitation, implication, or recommendation. Explain why the article matters to your own research.

Interaction:

Individual

Time: 40–50 minutes

---

4. Evidence of Learning

Student Evidence

Students will produce:

• one 250–300 word article review;
• an APA reference for the reviewed article;
• a revised final draft.

Evidence Check

The review should demonstrate that the student understands:

• what the study investigated;
• why it was conducted;
• how it was conducted;
• what the researchers found;
• why the study is relevant to the student’s research.

---

5. Assessment & Feedback

Assessment purpose: Summative with formative feedback during drafting.

Success Criteria

Students demonstrate successful learning when they can:

1. accurately explain the problem, purpose, methodology, findings, and conclusion;
2. select important information rather than summarize the entire article;
3. explain the article’s relevance to their own developing research;
4. use appropriate academic language, APA citation, reporting tense, and cautious claims.

Assessment Instrument

Rubric / Checklist

---

7. Responsible GenAI Use

GenAI should have an explicit pedagogical purpose. It should support learning without replacing the thinking, decision-making, or performance students are expected to demonstrate.

AI Use Level

Select the appropriate level:

• No GenAI — Students complete the experience without GenAI.

• Optional GenAI Support — Students may use GenAI for specified supporting purposes.

• Structured GenAI Use — Students use GenAI at designated stages and according to specific instructions.

• Critical GenAI Engagement — Students analyze, evaluate, verify, challenge, or revise AI-generated material.

• Required GenAI Collaboration — Interaction with GenAI is itself part of the intended learning experience.

---

Permitted Uses

Students may use GenAI to:

• Brainstorm

• Generate questions

• Clarify concepts

• Receive formative feedback

• Compare alternatives

• Practice language

• Generate an alternative perspective

• Revise after producing an initial version

• Critique AI-generated content

• Other: __________

Restricted Uses

GenAI may not:

• read and analyze the article instead of the student;

• decide which findings are most important;

• determine the article’s relevance to the student’s research;

• write the initial article review.

---

Cognitive Ownership

The student’s own reading, interpretation, evaluation, selection of evidence, and initial drafting must remain independent.

---

---

Final Design Check

Before submission, students should confirm:

• My review is 250–300 words.
• I explain the research problem and purpose.
• I briefly describe the methodology.
• I explain two or three major findings.
• I include the authors’ conclusion and/or an important limitation, implication, or recommendation.
• I explain why the article is relevant to my research.
• I mostly paraphrase instead of quote.
• I use appropriate APA citation.
• I use reporting tense and cautious language appropriately.
• The initial draft represents my own reading, thinking, and writing.
• If I used GenAI, I documented how I used it.