Clarity and Style: Managing Balance
Emphasis should be earned, not forced. That principle is remarkably consistent across the major style guides and authorities, although each emphasizes it in different ways.
The broad consensus among authorities such as The Craft of Research, Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace, The Sense of Style, the American Psychological Association, and university writing centers is this:
Make important ideas structurally prominent while expressing the appropriate degree of certainty.
Those two goals—emphasis and appropriate certainty—must work together.
- Structural emphasis comes first
Nearly every modern rhetoric and style guide argues that readers naturally assign importance to certain locations in a sentence.
The strongest positions are:
the grammatical subject
the main verb
the end of the sentence
the beginning of a paragraph
the end of a paragraph
Williams calls these the “stress positions.”
For example:
Weak:
There are many reasons why second-language learners struggle with academic writing.
Stronger:
Second-language learners struggle with academic writing for three primary reasons.
The important idea becomes the subject.
Likewise,
Weak:
It should be noted that vocabulary knowledge is important.
Strong:
Vocabulary knowledge predicts academic success.
The emphasis comes from sentence structure rather than extra words.
- Strong verbs create emphasis
Virtually every authority recommends replacing abstract nouns with strong verbs.
Instead of
The implementation of the policy resulted in…
write
The policy improved…
Strong verbs naturally increase emphasis while reducing unnecessary words.
- Hedging is not weakness
Academic writing almost never recommends writing with complete certainty unless the evidence truly warrants it.
Instead, scholars distinguish among levels of certainty.
Examples:
Very strong:
This proves…
Moderate:
This demonstrates…
More cautious:
This suggests…
Very cautious:
This may indicate…
Good writers choose the level that matches the evidence.
Overclaiming damages credibility.
- Boosting is also necessary
Many novice writers hedge everything.
For example:
It may perhaps possibly suggest…
That is just as problematic.
When evidence is strong, authorities recommend boosting.
For example:
Weak:
The results may suggest that explicit instruction is somewhat beneficial.
Appropriate:
The results clearly demonstrate that explicit instruction improves student performance.
The certainty matches the evidence.
- The balance: clarity before persuasion
Modern academic writing has largely moved away from sounding artificially cautious or artificially forceful.
Instead, writers should communicate their confidence honestly.
Think of certainty as a continuum:
Evidence Language
Speculation may, might, could
Plausible interpretation appears to, seems to, suggests
Supported finding indicates, demonstrates, shows
Strong evidence clearly demonstrates, strongly supports
Logical certainty proves (rare in empirical research)
Notice that “prove” is rarely appropriate outside mathematics and formal logic.
- APA’s position
APA recommends avoiding both:
exaggerated certainty
excessive hedging
Instead, claims should match the available evidence.
For example,
Poor:
The intervention completely solved the problem.
Also poor:
The intervention might perhaps possibly have had some effect.
Better:
The intervention significantly improved students’ writing performance.
- Pinker’s recommendation
Steven Pinker argues that many academic writers mistake complexity for authority.
Instead, he recommends:
concrete subjects
active verbs
logical organization
information flowing from known to new
emphasis created by syntax rather than inflated vocabulary
In other words,
Don’t write:
It is important to note that…
Write:
Vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension.
- The current consensus
If you compare APA, Chicago, Williams, Pinker, Booth, Graff & Birkenstein, and most university writing centers, they agree on a common framework:
-
Structure creates emphasis.
-
Strong verbs carry meaning.
-
Subjects should name the key actor or concept.
-
Sentence endings should contain the most important information.
-
Boost only when the evidence justifies confidence.
-
Hedge when the evidence is limited or interpretive.
-
The level of certainty should exactly match the quality of the evidence.
A useful way to think about it
For formal academic writing, emphasis is best viewed as the interaction of three independent dimensions:
Structural emphasis: where information is placed (subject, verb, sentence ending, paragraph opening).
Linguistic stance: how certain the writer is (hedging ↔ boosting).
Evidence strength: how much support the claim actually has.
The strongest academic prose aligns all three. A central finding is placed in a structurally prominent position, expressed with an appropriate level of confidence, and supported by evidence that warrants that confidence. When these dimensions are aligned, the writing is clear, persuasive, and intellectually honest.