[https://youtu.be/Oe47uaDAmwQ](https://youtu.be/Oe47uaDAmwQ) #### Literature Review Rubric |Scale|Criteria|Score| |---|---|---| |4 (80%-100%)|[[Literature review demonstrates complete understanding and execution of an integrated research project relevant to the teaching of English as an additional language. Thesis statement-argument is clearly...]]|| |3 (70%-79%)|[[Literature review demonstrates considerable understanding and execution of an integrated research project relevant to the teaching of English as an additional language. Thesis statement-argument verges...]]|| |2 (60%-69%)|[[Literature review demonstrates some understanding and execution of an integrated research project relevant to the teaching of English as an additional language. Thesis statement-argument may or may not...]]|| |1 (50%-59%)|[[Literature review demonstrates limited understanding and execution of an integrated research project relevant to the teaching of English as an additional language. Thesis statement-argument may or may...]]|| ## Notes > [!important] The criteria above applies to a literature review of approximately 2,500 words. Any significant word shortages will result in a proportional score. > [!important] This rubric complements individual feedback (verbal and written) provided to each learner. > [!important] Literature review will have one introductory paragraph, a body, and one > > [[Transitional Paragraph 2]]. ## Attribution > [!important] This holistic rubric was adapted from > > **[Queen's University](https://www.queensu.ca/teachingandlearning/modules/assessments/35_s4_05_types_of_rubrics.html), February 9, 2021.** > [!important] Literature review is based on, "... an integrated research project relevant to the teaching of English as an additional language" ( > > ==![[/Thesis_Seminar_Syllabus_2021_v3 2.pdf|Thesis_Seminar_Syllabus_2021_v3 2.pdf]]==).